Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Legislative Elections (Gregory Brown)

Hello all.

I'm at the Athens airport hotel awaiting my flight home and catching up with the French news. Meanwhile, reader Gregory Brown of UNLV kindly sent me a comment on the legislative elections, which I reproduce below. Thanks to Gregory, as well as to Dan, Mary, and Cindy, for keeping the blog going in my absence.

Here is Gregory's comment on the elections:

There's a really interesting article in today's Le Monde about how turnout made the difference in a lot of close races (those districts with >60% turnout went left while those with <57%went right by large margins). I'd suggest that this turnout
dynamic and some anecdotal evidence suggests there is a difference between
the strong
support Sarkozy personally enjoys among voters from the center to the far
right, versus the very tepid support on the center (and strong opposition
on the left) for economic policies
which, exemplified by the proposed TVA social, would clearly favor
employers and the wealthy over those who are concerned about salaries,
benefits and purchasing power.
People who were told they were voting for a government that would speak to
hard-working, long-suffering, underpaid employees did not like it when they
learned that they would
be getting in fact higher sales tax to make up for a cut in the employers'
payroll tax.

Interestingly, there seems to have been the most marked drop off in turnout
for the first round in some of the banlieux, which suggests either a
tempering of opposition of minority voters
towards Sarkozy (the 'effet Dati') or, as I'd argue, a real support among
that electorate for Royal (who does seem to have contributed to a
remoblization fo that electorate for the second round
in place she campaigned such as Sarcelles.


Anonymous said...

It's difficult to say how much of an effect the TVA social gaff played in the second round of the legislative elections. For an interesting defence of it, see Sarkozy's recent interview with PPA and Claire Chazal on TF1. The argument is presented in a way in which various taxes appear as neutral accounting identities, shifting the emphasis from - say - work to imports, without saying anything about the differential effects of the proposal on specific groups of people within society. I think the desire to check the power of the president was a factor in the vote.

Quico said...

Interesting. But I have one nit to pick: it's a sin to translate "TVA" as "Sales Tax." A value-added tax is levied on every stage of a product's production chain, not just the last step.

Anonymous said...

good point.

It is however assessed on the consumer at the point of sale, meaning that it is experienced as a price increase (especially in France, where prices must by law include the tax). So that for the consumer, it is experienced at least in the short term as a reduction in purchasing power.

Anonymous said...

^^ nice blog!! ^@^

徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 感情挽回, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 挽回感情, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 捉姦, 徵信公司, 通姦, 通姦罪, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 捉姦, 監聽, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 外遇問題, 徵信, 捉姦, 女人徵信, 女子徵信, 外遇問題, 女子徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 徵信公司, 徵信網, 外遇蒐證, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 外遇沖開, 抓姦, 女子徵信, 外遇蒐證, 外遇, 通姦, 通姦罪, 贍養費, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信公司, 女人徵信, 外遇

徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵信網, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 女人徵信, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信,

徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 離婚, 外遇,離婚,

徵信社,外遇, 離婚, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信, 外遇, 徵信,外遇, 抓姦, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信,徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社,徵信,徵信,